Group members rate their peers within the group using the following rubric. (Note: Rating of team members should reflect each individual's level of participation, effort, and sense of responsibility, NOT academic ability! Specific ratings of team members will remain confidential.)

Abbrv Rating Description
E Excellent Consistently went above and beyond; tutored teammates, routinely did far more than his/her assigned team responsibilities.
VG Very Good Always did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative.
G Good Mostly did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative.
S Satisfactory More often than not did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative.
M Marginal Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared.
D Deficient Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared.
U Unsatisfactory Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, unprepared.

The peer evaluations are used to compute a multiplier for each group member. The project receives an overall grade of X points without factoring in peer evaluations. Group member $g$ with peer-eval multiplier $m_g$ receives as their individual grade $X \cdot m_g$ points. The example below illustrates how the peer-eval multipliers are computed.

Rating-to-points      Example of how multipliers are computed
Excellent100
Very Good90
Good80
Satisfactory70
Marginal60
Deficient50
Unsat40
     

Continuing with the example: if this group's project received an overall grade of 88 points, then Alice would get 88*1.09 = 95.9 points, Bob would get 88*1.13=99.4 points, Cathy would get 88*1.05 = 92.4 points and Don would get 8*0.73 = 64.2 points.

Note: A link to the google form for peer evaluations was sent to you via e-mail.